JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 26, 2000

A- de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Alberto Murillo Palacio

✓
Topic · hard data
Nulidad Sentencia T-898/99
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se denegó la solicitud formulada por el ciudadano de la referencia para que se declare la nulidad de la Sentencia T-898/99, proferida por la Sala Segunda de Revisión de esta Corporación, toda vez que el asunto tratado no puede ser objeto de la decisión en una acción de tutela, la cual, por su propia naturaleza, cuando se trate de providencias judiciales sólo resulta de recibo ante el "burdo desconocimiento de las normas legales", cuando con él se "vulnera la Constitución y quebranta los derechos de quienes acceden a la administración de justicia", lo que ha de resultar ostensible y, por su propia índole, de ocurrencia muy excepcional.

Contra la presente providencia no procede recurso alguno.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. DENEGAR la solicitud formulada por el senor Alberto de J. Murillo Palacio para que se declare la nulidad de la sentencia T-898 de 11 de noviembre de 1999, proferida por la Sala Segunda de Revision de esta Corporacion.
  2. Contra la presente providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.